Packer Update

A healthy Harrell’s worth keeping

Harrell's had a solid summer

Through four weeks of practices and two preseason games, Justin Harrell has proven a couple of things. One is that he’ll never live up to his lofty draft status. Even before Harrell injured his back for the first time in 2008, he never looked like an impact defensive lineman. He lacks the explosiveness and the tenacity that makes players like Chicago’s Tommy Harris, Oakland’s Richard Seymour, Minnesota’s Kevin Williams, Arizona’s Darnell Dockett and Baltimore’s Haloti Ngata so good. The other is that he’s clearly one of the top four ends on the current roster, with the gap to No. 5 being pretty sizable. And while nobody in the front office is doing cartwheels over the fact that the 16th pick in the ’07 draft is a better player than Jarius Wynn, C.J. Wilson and Ronald Talley, it does provide a strong argument for keeping him around for another season.

Mike Vandermause of the Green Bay Press-Gazette sees things differently. He opined recently that it’s time for the Packers to cut ties with Harrell. He argued that No. 91 couldn’t be counted on to last an entire season, and that by keeping him on the final roster, another presumably healthier defensive lineman would have to be released. He’s absolutely right on both counts. But so what? If Harrell’s back is OK to start the season, he’s clearly one of the best 53 players on the team. And isn’t the goal of every general manager to keep the best 53 players? Besides, how risky is it to release Wilson and/or Talley? Both players are eligible for the practice squad, and based on their performances this summer, it’s highly unlikely that either would be signed to another team’s active roster. In short, keeping Harrell is unquestionably a gamble, but as things stand right now, it’s one definitely worth taking.

Tags: ,

6 Comments to "A healthy Harrell’s worth keeping"

  1. Archie says:

    Another bullseye. Keep up the good work.


  2. lars says:

    Watch Harrell flop around in the Cleveland game and then tell us you still believe he’s fit to be a Packer. The man simply cannot sustain any level of football intensity. He’ll show some heart for a few practices and then beg off with “back pain.” Or, child birth or?

    Ron Wolf (TT’s mentor) said to admit your mistakes and move on. Ted’s pride/ego won’t allow this with JH. Please, cut the cord on this puppy and let’s move on!

  3. Dont text me brett says:

    A couple of the beat guys think its a real possibility that they go with 5 tight ends. It’s possible, but then we would have to cut both punters. ;)

  4. DaveK says:

    Did you read the JS article about his performance in the Seattle game? Maybe he had an off night but damn was he bad. Not sure he is worth keeping unless he plays better tonight. I say they give him 60 snaps tonight and see how he plays and how the back responds tommorow morning.

  5. Archie says:

    91 looked doggy v Colts.

  6. DaveK says:

    I don’t think he makes the 53. He was awful against Seattle getting pushed all over the field. Against the Colts he was ineffective against the 2nd and 3rd team. It would be one thing if he could play well when healthy but if he plays like this when healthy then what is the point? I know they are thin at DE but I think they go with one of the other guys who isn’t one play away from the IR.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Web Design BangladeshBangladesh online Market