Packer Update

Odds improving for two long shots

Lumpkin's competing with a surprising rookie for a spot on the final 53-man roster

People were ready to anoint James Starks the No. 3 running back the minute they watched highlights of the former University at Buffalo star on You Tube. And why not? He looked big and fast, and more importantly, his competition was a veteran who couldn’t beat out DeShawn Wynn last summer and an undrafted rookie from Stillman College. Well, a funny thing happened on the way to final cuts – Starks suffered a hamstring injury and Kregg Lumpkin and Quinn Porter stayed healthy and got better every day. Now it appears as if the pre-training camp favorite is going to be spending the entire summer on the PUP list while the underdogs are duking it out for a spot on the 53-man roster.

So it looks like Lumpkin vs. Porter for the chance to sit and watch Grant run and Jackson block. OK, so it’s not exactly Ali vs. Frazier for the heavyweight title, but it should be a pretty interesting battle nonetheless. The tale of the tape shows a distinct advantage for Lumpkin in size and experience; Porter gets the edge in speed and special teams. The determining factor – as it was last summer when Wynn beat out Lumpkin and Terrell Sutton – could be which player the coaches trust most to protect the quarterback on third and long.

Lumpkin isn’t great in blitz pickup, but he’s certainly been more consistent than Porter – at least early on. That gives him the edge going into the first preseason game against Cleveland. But Porter’s electrifying 80-yard run in practice the other day is just the type of play that tends to stay etched in the mind of a coach and a general manager for a long time. Still, the guess here is that Lumpkin will earn a spot on the final 53 for the second time in three years and Porter will begin the season on the practice squad.

Tags: , , ,

5 Comments to "Odds improving for two long shots"

  1. nerdmann says:

    Lumpkin is way to similar to Grant and Jackson. We’ve already got two guys just like him. We need to mix it up a little. For instance, a guy with speed, quickness and who can you know, CATCH the ball on screens. (Without tipping it up in the air first.)

  2. Reedy says:

    I believe a change of pace back like Porter is a good thing. The Pack tried stashing one last year on the practice squad that should have made the team and we know how that turned out. They need to keep him on the 53 man roster if he performs in the preseason like he has in training camp.

  3. stroh says:

    I lean toward keeping Porter too… Love that he brings a dimention that none of the other RB do. He’s good good size but is really elusive, a really good pass reciever (played WR as a FR), has kick and punt return ability and should be a good ST player. Lumpkin just doen’t excite me in anyway. He’s good but he’ll never make a game changing play the way Porter could. Really unhappy about Starks… But put him on IR or the practice sqaud and he could be a player yet.

  4. Wolfman says:

    A quick, elusive pass-catcher at RB? Sign me up! We already have two others like Lumpkin and he cannot stay healthy. Plus I have read that Quinn has looked solid as a returner. We may have found two solid contributors in the undrafted heap this year: Shields and Porter. Good job, Ted and Co.!

  5. Archie says:

    Porter is what we were hoping Starks would be so I say keep him. If TT believes Lumpkin is NFL starter quality, then keep 4 RBs and one or two FBs.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>